2000 Mazda Protege

AdChoices
MSN Autos acquires crash test data provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These organizations provide data for specific types of tests, which are valuable to consumers and worth observing.

NHTSA Frontal Crash Test

NHTSA rates crash-tested vehicles by assigning them one to five stars, with five stars indicating the most injury protection and one star indicating the least protection.
  Protege
Driver Front  11-20 percent or greater chance of serious injury 
Passenger Front  11-20 percent or greater chance of serious injury 

IIHS Frontal Offset Crash Test

About IIHS
Each vehicle’s frontal offset crashworthiness is based on performance in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.  Ratings depend on how well the structure/safety cage protects the occupant compartment, the risk of injury measured for an average-sized male, and how well the restraint system controls occupant movement.
Rating Key:
G Good A Acceptable M Marginal P Poor
Injury measures
Vehicle make/model OVERALL Structure/ safety cage Head/ neck Chest Leg/foot left, right Restraints/ dummy kinematics
2000 Mazda ProtegeAAGGMPA
(Tested: 1999 Mazda Protege LX 4-door)
Get full details from IIHS

IIHS Frontal Offset Crash Video

IIHS Frontal Offset Crash Photos

Action shot taken during the frontal offset crash test. – © Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Action shot taken during the frontal offset crash test.
The driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well, although there was more intrusion into the footwell area than is desirable. – © Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
The driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well, although there was more intrusion into the footwell area than is desirable.
Intrusion into the footwell area contributed to the likelihood of leg injuries. – © Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Intrusion into the footwell area contributed to the likelihood of leg injuries.
The rear bumper system on the 1999 model allowed excessive damage in a 5 mph pole impact -- more than $2,800 worth of damage compared with about $700 damage to the predecessor Protege model. – © Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
The rear bumper system on the 1999 model allowed excessive damage in a 5 mph pole impact -- more than $2,800 worth of damage compared with about $700 damage to the predecessor Protege model.
The crashworthiness data for this vehicle has been obtained from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and is protected by copyrights and other proprietary rights. You may reproduce a copy of the data for personal use only. You may not repost, distribute, sell, publish, broadcast, or any other way commercially exploit any of the data without written permission from the Institute.

Safety Features & Specs

Does this car have airbags or ABS? Get the safety features and specs on this car.

Auto Safety Tips

How Dangerous Is It?
Why do they get such ineffective training?
New regulations will require better rear field-of-view for new vehicles.
advertisement

Search local listings

powered by:

Recently Viewed Cars

View favorites
BB03 - 9/20/2014 11:09:42 AM