The Lancer is a major improvement over its dowdy predecessor, and we found it much more agile in our testing. It shares its engine with Hyundai and Chrysler, and tends to moan a bit at high revs. The CVT transmission works very well. Standard electronic stability control and curtain air bags are a plus.
There are no 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer reviews. However, the following might be helpful:
Category ComparisonWhat's this?
Trim Selection (sorted by price):
There are no 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer video reviews. However, the following might be helpful:
2011 Mitsubishi Lancer
"With its rally-proven performance features and a versatile Sportback model, the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer…
The community thinks...
Wolf In Sheep Clothing by Ricky on 05/10/2012. Trim: 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer GT, Owned less than 1 year.
Pros: 2.4 Engine (I got 0-60 in about 7 seconds which equals the new Subaru BRZ!), Styling, Handling, MPG (I get about 32-33 mpg avg city/hwy driving, have 4000 miles on the car). Base stereo with 6 speakers sounds very good.
Cons: Ergonomics in this car very good, but the front seat could be a little more comfortable. Also happy with the Bluetooth, but the USB connection location is not the best.
Overall review: Considering the warranty offered (5 years/60k bumper to bumper and 10 years/100k Powertrain). I believe Mitsubishi (and another name plate) have the best industry warranty offered. This includes 5 year of roadside assistance! Mitsubishi needs to do a better marketing and let more people know about the warranty. This car has CVT and Paddle Shifts and basically the non turbo version of the Ralliart model (with better MPG, Warranty and the same Handling as the Ralliart) I got this car for 17k plus ttl and very happy with my purchase (Amazed with the Avg MPG of 32-33, even when driving 70 and up in the HWY mph ). Mitsubishi: Put the 2.4 engine in the Outlander Sport! Overall very happy with My purchase!
Review ID: #559012 Is this review offensive?