2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

AdChoices
Tell us what you think...
The community thinks...
  • Styling9.4
  • Performance8.9
  • Interior9.0
  • Quality8.6
  • Recommendation8.9
See reviews by
Owners
Test Drivers
Enthusiasts
Sort by
1 - 5 of 200 reviews
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next
Show per page
Owner
  • Styling9.0
  • Performance10
  • Interior8.0
  • Quality8.0
  • Recommendation10
Great Pre-Owned Value by Alex, Iowa on 01/06/2010. Trim: 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS, Owned 4 years.
3
Pros: Excellent bang for the buck, especially as a pre-owned. Definately performs above what one would expect given the pricetag today. Had some minor mechanical problems, but I purchased mine with high miles (130,000) and it lasted a long time (40,000) before anything came up. The problems were minor, i fixed them on my own (cheap repairs!) with no previous car experience and simple instructions and tips found online. Fair price, easy and cheap to improve on your own. I've done a lot of fun projects with mine, learned a lot.
Cons: Selling it seems like a big loss, the sell value is lower than the worth. Definately a buyer's car. City milage v.s. highway is rediculous, i'm happy i do mostly highway driving.
Overall review: I would definately recommend this car. When i got it, i just wanted to pay it off and trade up. Now i'm serious about keeping and caring for this car. She's my "brown sugar"
Review ID: #544773 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling10
  • Performance8.0
  • Interior8.0
  • Quality8.0
  • Recommendation8.0
Really Nice Mid Size Sports car by Carl Moodispaugh on 02/21/2002. Trim: 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS, Owned 1 year.
2
Pros: It has excellent handling, fuel economy and enough power for todays cars. While not a NASCAR power car, it does hang with the dawgs!
Cons: It should be rear wheel drive and a V*!!
Overall review: Excellent buy for power, economy and style. Not for family but for a young or older couple.
Review ID: #251279 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling8.0
  • Performance9.0
  • Interior9.0
  • Quality9.0
  • Recommendation8.0
LS 2000 Monte Carlo by II nyc mark on 06/23/2009. Trim: 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS, Owned 2 years.
1
Pros: OKComfort. OKRide. OK Braking. Very GD.extior looksl. OK electronics.Radio quality, sound ok. -OK antitheft device. OK Remorte [also programmable] -OK interior ligths. -Exterios Lights,settings,etc. All Programmable accessories: Excellent and very reliable,tested...Message Board ref.several important driving conditions. OK Dual-Zone Heather+A/C.
Cons: -Sooping front end[lenght is hard to guess,you need to be carefull parking etc] -Rear + side visibility not the best. -Rain noise when speeding[Washer is OK]. -Some Tire noise on hiway but onlly if windows open-maywrong new tires. --Bumpers,front+back, wish they were plastic/rubber-less sublect to very small stratches
Overall review: - 98+ perct saisfactory car. sure would again buy it !
Review ID: #540521 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling8.0
  • Performance8.0
  • Interior6.0
  • Quality4.0
  • Recommendation4.0
would not recommend by Ozzy from michigan on 02/04/2008. Trim: 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, Owned 8 years.
1
Pros: speed,handling
Cons: As soon as I hit 70,000 miles I've had electrical problems with turn signals,starting,and fuel gage.
Overall review: If GM can't build a car that can last at least to 100,000 miles,I can see why they are losing market share. They care more about the dollar then anything else.
Review ID: #522763 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling10
  • Performance9.0
  • Interior9.0
  • Quality9.0
  • Recommendation10
My Monte Carlo SS by Mike from Wisconsin on 03/29/2005. Trim: 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, Owned 6 years.
1
Pros: Stylish and sporty looking car. Everyone I know wants to drive it. It corners excellent and has a decent acceleration to it for a 6 cylinder. Truly lives up to Chevys' slogan of being the heartbeat.
Cons: I'm not a fan of 6 cylinder engines or ABS brakes so my reply to this is a little biased. Although, even with these features I was totally impressed. Also the styling of the rear taillights could have been different. I don't like the fish bowl effect.
Overall review: If Chevy could take this car and stuff in a turbo charged 350 V8 and rear wheel drive they would outdo even today's Shelby Mustang! How about it Chevy??
Review ID: #466307 Is this review offensive?
1 - 5 of 200 reviews
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next
Show per page
Information or opinions expressed in these reviews are not endorsed by Microsoft Corporation nor MSN Autos. Have comments about MSN Autos' User Reviews? Send us an email.
advertisement

Search local listings

powered by:

Recently Viewed Cars

View favorites
BB02 - 8/1/2014 7:07:26 AM