1996 Ford Aerostar

1996 Ford Aerostar Prices
Blue Book® Suggested Retail Value
1996 Ford Aerostar Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy (city/hwy)
AdChoices
Tell us what you think...
The community thinks...
  • Styling8.1
  • Performance8.3
  • Interior8.4
  • Quality8.6
  • Recommendation8.8
See reviews by
Owners
Test Drivers
Enthusiasts
Sort by
1 - 5 of 61 reviews
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next
Show per page
Owner
  • Styling9.0
  • Performance9.0
  • Interior9.0
  • Quality9.0
  • Recommendation10
the uitimate van by john tremblett aylmer ont on 02/25/2012. Trim: 1996 Ford Aerostar XLT, Owned 4 years.
3
Pros: they are a great vans.we still have one and have went through two before this one.we would love to find another one in good condition
Cons: bottom of the sides infront of the wheels rot
Overall review: if you find one in with a good body buy it.
Review ID: #556354 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling10
  • Performance10
  • Interior8.0
  • Quality10
  • Recommendation10
GREAT VAN by LJ, FRANKLINTON, LA` on 01/02/2004. Trim: 1996 Ford Aerostar XLT, Owned 5 years.
2
Pros: THIS VAN IS NOT A FRONT WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE-WHICH MEANS I HAVE NOT HAD TO REPLACE MY TIRES NEAR AS OFTEN DUE TO ALIGNMENT PROBLEM NOR CVJOINTS TO WORRY ABOUT REPLACING WHICH IS A MAJOR EXPENSE IN MOST FRONT WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES-
Cons: I HONESTLY CAN NOT THINK OF ONE
Overall review: I HAVE 115000 MILES ON MY VAN & THE ONLY COMPLAINT THAT I WOULD GIVE FORD IS THAT THEY NO LONGER MAKE THIS VAN. THE ONLY THING I HAVE REPLACED ON THIS VAN OR THE TIRES, BATTERY & BRAKES EVERYTHING ELSE IS ORGINAL PARTS-IF ONLY ALL VEHICLES WERE BUILT & HELD UP AS WELL- THIS VAN CERTAINLY OUTDID THE DODGE CARAVAN I HAD-WHICH WAS A 93 & AT 73,000 MILES HAD TO HAVE A NEW TRANSMISSION - IT WAS ALSO A FRONT WHEEL DRIVE AUTO.
Review ID: #401408 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling3.0
  • Performance5.0
  • Interior7.0
  • Quality6.0
  • Recommendation5.0
A kind of good van, but way to many problems by Allen, alick, Utah on 07/19/2002. Trim: 1996 Ford Aerostar XLT, Owned 5 years.
1
Pros: Cargo space, towing lots of room inside
Cons: Braking, way to many problems, plus Ford dealers can't even fix them, to much of a box on wheels dash bord odd looking
Overall review: The Aerstar is just an average van.
Review ID: #292323 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling10
  • Performance10
  • Interior10
  • Quality10
  • Recommendation10
The Ultimate Vehicle by Al From LaCrosse Wisconsin on 05/13/2002. Trim: 1996 Ford Aerostar XLT, Owned 4 years.
1
Pros: I like EVERYTHING about this car( excepy the Spare tire wich is one of those little ones) I guess if there was a down side it would be that Ford has decided to stop making this Body style, That makes me cry, I don't know why when they come up with something so perfect, they have to go and change it?
Cons: Stated above...DON"T STOP MAKING THIS BODY STYLE!!!
Overall review: Best car i have ever owned
Review ID: #273920 Is this review offensive?
Owner
  • Styling4.0
  • Performance5.0
  • Interior6.0
  • Quality6.0
  • Recommendation4.0
truck by jim on 10/04/2001. Trim: 1996 Ford Aerostar XLT, Owned 1 year.
1
Pros: nothing
Cons: the ride is rough
Overall review: it is inexpensive
Review ID: #210957 Is this review offensive?
1 - 5 of 61 reviews
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Next
Show per page
Information or opinions expressed in these reviews are not endorsed by Microsoft Corporation nor MSN Autos. Have comments about MSN Autos' User Reviews? Send us an email.

Search local listings

powered by:

Recently Viewed Cars

View favorites

Save Time and Money:

Get your loan, then get your car.
Shop with confidence. Rates as low as
1.99% APR*
*View Disclosures and Offer Information

The trusted lender of MSN Autoslogo
BB04 - 6/18/2013 9:02:32 PM